From: | "Dave Cramer" <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: can't stop autovacuum by HUP'ing the server |
Date: | 2008-08-26 14:31:31 |
Message-ID: | 491f66a50808260731n3060c758u8067fad93ad18802@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera <
> alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>> > Ok, here are the logs from last night
>> >
>> > 2008-08-26 04:00:02 EDT [25407] LOG: received SIGHUP, reloading
>> > configuration files
>> > 2008-08-26 04:00:02 EDT [22649] LOG: autovacuum launcher shutting down
>> > 2008-08-26 04:00:02 EDT [30438] LOG: autovacuum launcher started
>> >
>> >
>> > you can see the SIGHUP, the launcher being shut down, and starting right
>> > back up again ???
>> >
>> > is this expected behaviour ?
>>
>> Certainly not, and that's not what I see here either. I assume process
>> 25407 is (was) the postmaster, yes?
>>
>> If you "show autovacuum", is it on?
>
>
> Yes that was the postmaster, and I did check to see if autovacuum was on,
> and it was not.
>
> Dave
>
>>
So where do we go from here ?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-08-26 14:56:13 | Re: can't stop autovacuum by HUP'ing the server |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-08-26 14:18:21 | Re: Another refactoring proposal: move stuff into nodes/nodeFuncs.[ch] |