Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10
Date: 2008-11-10 16:04:00
Message-ID: 49185B70.8010302@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> What about the MakeMaker dependency?
>>>
>
>
>> The call to ldopts will fail if MakeMaker is not present, so this will
>> cover it. It's very unlikely to be absent - it's required to build
>> almost every Perl module known to man.
>>
>
> I see. I think then the error message should read something like
>
> AC_MSG_ERROR([could not determine flags for linking embedded Perl
> This probably means that ExtUtils::Embed or ExtUtils::MakeMaker is not
> installed.])
>
> Otherwise, looks good.
>
>
>

OK. Should we backpatch this? Arguably it's a build bug.

(Also it would be good if someone were to whisper in the ears of the
Fedora people that removing ExtUtils::Embed entirely from their Perl
packaging is a dumb thing to do. This is a standard Perl module, that
one would normally expect to accompany every Perl distribution.)

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-11-10 16:20:35 Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-11-10 16:03:37 Re: gram.y=>preproc.y