Re: Possible bug in date(timestamptz)?

From: dev(at)archonet(dot)com
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible bug in date(timestamptz)?
Date: 2003-03-27 21:38:48
Message-ID: 49178.192.168.1.32.1048801128.squirrel@mainbox.archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> writes:
>> I can't think why one would be immutable and the other not,
>
> You aren't thinking hard enough, then :-(
>
> date(timestamptz) depends on the TimeZone setting, the other does not.

I thought immutable was for the length of a statement. Reading it, I see
that "stable" covers that. Timestamp without time zone it is then.

Thanks Tom

- Richard Huxton

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-03-27 21:43:29 Re: pg_dump (v-7.3.2) of individual schemas
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-03-27 21:38:17 Re: DeleteTransactionInProgress