From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Patch for SQL-Standard Interval output and decoupling DateStyle from IntervalStyle |
Date: | 2008-11-08 15:11:06 |
Message-ID: | 4915AC0A.9070608@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> writes:
>> Rather than forcing Postgres mode; couldn't it put a
>> "set intervalstyle = [whatever the current interval style is]"
>> in the dump file?
>
> This would work for loading into a PG >= 8.4 server, and fail miserably
> for loading into pre-8.4 servers. Even though we don't guarantee
> backwards compatibility of dump files, I'm loath to adopt a solution
> that will successfully load wrong data into an older server.
How is the case different from standard_conforming_strings; where ISTM
depending on postgresql.conf 8.4 will happily dump either
SET standard_conforming_strings = off;
...
INSERT INTO dumptest VALUES ('\\\\');
or
SET standard_conforming_strings = on;
...
INSERT INTO dumptest VALUES ('\\');
and AFAICT the latter will happily load wrong data into 8.1 with
only the error message
ERROR: parameter "standard_conforming_strings" cannot be changed
I imagine the use-case for "standard_conforming_strings = 0 " and
"intervalstyle = sql_standard" are petty similar as well.
I wonder if the best solution is that any dump file with
standard_conforming_strings=on include some SQL that will refuse
to load in pre-8.2 systems; and that any dump file with
intervalstyle=sql_standard refuse to load in pre-8.4 systems.
It seems pretty easy to add a sql fragment that checks version()
and put that in the beginning of a dump file that uses these GUCs
to enforce this.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2008-11-08 15:51:10 | Re: Windowing Function Patch Review -> Standard Conformance |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2008-11-08 15:03:37 | Re: Windowing Function Patch Review -> Standard Conformance |