Re: Final /contrib cleanup -- yes/no?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Final /contrib cleanup -- yes/no?
Date: 2008-11-06 22:35:58
Message-ID: 4913714E.2070809@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 17:24 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>>> The way the SQL scripts currently work, there is no way to manage what
>>> schema the contrib modules get built in *except* to edit the scripts.
>> Right, that's the intended and documented way to do it.
>
> I believe the intention is a bad one. They should be installed per the
> settings of the user installing them. Whether that be through an ALTER
> ROLE/USER or PGOPTIONS.

Eh, Tom has a point. If we build module loading for 8.5, we shouldn't
change the functionality in the interim for 8.4. Annoying as it is.

--Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-11-06 22:52:54 Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-Batch Hash Join for Skewed Data Sets
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-11-06 22:34:07 Re: Final /contrib cleanup -- yes/no?