Re: array_agg (was Re: The Axe list)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Ian Caulfield <ian(dot)caulfield(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: array_agg (was Re: The Axe list)
Date: 2008-11-04 10:36:54
Message-ID: 491025C6.8070304@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ian Caulfield wrote:
> 2008/10/15 Ian Caulfield <ian(dot)caulfield(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> I started to look at implementing array_agg by making the existing
>> intagg stuff more generic
>
> ... and here's what I've come up with.

Going through the commit fest listings, I think we can safely omit this
patch and work out an in-core solution somewhere between the patches of
Robert Haas and Jeff Davis.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Detlef Ulherr 2008-11-04 11:09:44 Probable problem with pg_standby
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-11-04 09:52:41 Re: Hot standby v5 patch - Databases created post backup remain inaccessible + replica SIGSEGV when coming out of standby