From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Christophe <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, pgsql List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Are there plans to add data compression feature to postgresql? |
Date: | 2008-10-30 15:54:23 |
Message-ID: | 4909D8AF.7020401@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Christophe <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com
> <mailto:xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> I'm a bit surprised to hear that; what would pg be doing, unique to
> it, that would cause it to be slower on a RAID-1 cluster than on a
> plain drive?
>
> yes, it is slower on mirror-raid from single drive.
> I can give you all the /proc/* dumps if you want, as far as computer
> goes, it isn't anything fancy. dual way p4, and sata drives of some sort.
O.k. that doesn't actually surprise me all that much. Software RAID 1 on
SATA Drives for specific workloads would be slower than a single drive.
It should still be faster for reads assuming some level of concurrency
but not likely faster for a single thread. Writes would be expected to
be slower because you are managing across two spindles, identical writes
and SATA is slow for that type of thing.
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> GJ
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-10-30 17:13:16 | Re: Decreasing WAL size effects |
Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2008-10-30 15:42:33 | Re: Are there plans to add data compression feature to postgresql? |