| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql Feature request \set query |
| Date: | 2008-10-23 08:14:06 |
| Message-ID: | 4900324E.6080103@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2008/10/23 Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>:
>> For making psql fully scriptable I would think it would be smarter to embed
>> a full well-supported existing language rather than trying to invent a new
>> one.
>
> plpgsql?
I think plpgsql is a pretty good example of the sort of disaster you get
when you invent a language from nearly scratch.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-10-23 08:29:03 | Re: psql Feature request \set query |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-10-23 07:14:31 | Re: psql Feature request \set query |