From: | gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Joint user survey with EnterpriseDB? |
Date: | 2009-07-02 01:28:02 |
Message-ID: | 48bb92b0907011828m316ca326mf6494be0ceca6c40@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:27:56 +0930
> From: Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz>
> To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
> Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>,
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,
> "Leif B. Kristensen" <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org>,
> pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: Joint user survey with EnterpriseDB?
> Message-ID: <4A4B7974(dot)30802(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz>
>
> I don't think it would be a good idea to have the same survey on two
> sites. People will just get confused about whether to fill out one or
> both or which one is preferable.
I agree. Unless there is some method by which data will be aggregated
(in which case, you need to make allowances for those who answered
both surveys), having two is not ideal.
gabrielle
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-07-02 01:54:50 | Re: Release is out ... please collect press links! |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-07-02 01:27:09 | Re: Joint user survey with EnterpriseDB? |