Re: Joint user survey with EnterpriseDB?

From: gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Joint user survey with EnterpriseDB?
Date: 2009-07-02 01:28:02
Message-ID: 48bb92b0907011828m316ca326mf6494be0ceca6c40@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:27:56 +0930
> From: Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz>
> To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
> Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>,
>  "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,
>  "Leif B. Kristensen" <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org>,
>  pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: Joint user survey with EnterpriseDB?
> Message-ID: <4A4B7974(dot)30802(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz>
>
> I don't think it would be a good idea to have the same survey on two
> sites. People will just get confused about whether to fill out one or
> both or which one is preferable.

I agree. Unless there is some method by which data will be aggregated
(in which case, you need to make allowances for those who answered
both surveys), having two is not ideal.

gabrielle

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-07-02 01:54:50 Re: Release is out ... please collect press links!
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-07-02 01:27:09 Re: Joint user survey with EnterpriseDB?