Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases
Date: 2016-10-01 20:51:30
Message-ID: 48b4f158-a975-0f7c-60c5-8cf0538b2ea3@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/1/2016 11:39 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
> As others have said, different databases makes connection pooling less
> efficient, which could be very important to you, or could be irrelevant.

1000 apps running at once each with their own DB and 10s of connections
== 10s of 1000s of database connections, which means 10s of 1000s of
database processes.

1000 apps only connecting as needed for each transaction == database
server forks for every connection, expensive.

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2016-10-01 20:52:41 Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases
Previous Message Rakesh Kumar 2016-10-01 19:52:00 Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases