| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How to get schema name which violates fk constraint |
| Date: | 2008-10-22 17:48:23 |
| Message-ID: | 48FF6767.1090808@postnewspapers.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
George Pavlov wrote:
> I
> suspect lack of complaints is largely due to the (small) number of
> people using namespaces -- the denominator should be users of the
> feature, not all users...
I certainly found it extremely frustrating that errors didn't reference
the involved schema when I was working on a database that used several
sets of tables with the same names and structure under different schema.
As it happens I ended up finding it to be much better to store all the
data in a single set of tables with composite primary keys, but there
are certainly situations where that won't be the case.
I can see, however, that it might be a pretty tedious thing to do and
not very high on anybody's fun-to-code list.
--
Craig Ringer
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ma. Cristina Peña C. | 2008-10-22 20:01:10 | triggers problems whit function |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-22 17:40:16 | Re: ALTER/DROP table/view assymmetry |