| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Michael Glaesemann" <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: minimal update |
| Date: | 2008-10-22 22:11:50 |
| Message-ID: | 48FF5ED6.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:
>> > How about
>> > something like "suppress_no_op_updates_trigger"?
>
> I think it means something to us, but "no op" is a very technical
phrase
> that probably doesn't travel very well. Not everybody Majored in
Comp
> Sci and speaks Amglish as their native language.
>
> Certainly this intention is much better than "minimal", but a more
> widely acceptable phrase is probably better. I will avoid trying to
come
> up with something myself though.
How about one of these?:
suppress_same_value_updates_trigger
suppress_no_change_updates_trigger
suppress_no_effect_updates_trigger
They all seem a bit awkward, but the best that came to mind.
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-22 22:20:44 | Re: Block level concurrency during recovery |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2008-10-22 22:10:55 | Re: minimal update |