Re: [PERFORM] Backup strategies

From: Howard Cole <howardnews(at)selestial(dot)com>
To: "Reuven M(dot) Lerner" <reuven(at)lerner(dot)co(dot)il>, 'PgSql General' <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Backup strategies
Date: 2008-10-21 15:28:51
Message-ID: 48FDF533.1020400@selestial.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

Reuven M. Lerner wrote:
> I'm running a medium-traffic Web site that has been running for a few
> years, and which uses about four PostgreSQL databases on a regular
> basis. I'm currently running 8.2, although I'm planning to upgrade to
> 8.3 in the coming week or two, in part because of the problems that
> I'm having. The databases consume a combined total of 35 GB. Like a
> good boy, I've been backing the system up overnight, when we have less
> traffic, since the site began to run. I use pg_dump to back up,
> saving both schemas and data for a full restore in case of failure.
> pg_dump typically executes from another machine on a local network; if
> it would help to run pg_dump locally, then I'm certainly open to doing
> that.
>
One point to note with continuous archiving, if your four databases are
in the same cluster, then restoring the archive will restore all your
databases to the same point in time. So you cannot, as far as I am
aware, restore just one of the four databases.

Howard.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-10-21 15:39:46 Re: Annoying Reply-To
Previous Message Karl Nack 2008-10-21 15:02:26 Re: How best to implement a multi-table constraint?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-10-21 15:39:46 Re: Annoying Reply-To
Previous Message Martin Gainty 2008-10-20 14:56:10 Re: Annoying Reply-To