| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: minimal update |
| Date: | 2008-10-21 14:11:41 |
| Message-ID: | 48FDE31D.5040200@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>
>> In that case, why not put the trigger in core so people can use it
>> easily?
>>
>
> One advantage of making it a contrib module is that discussing how/when
> to use it would fit more easily into the structure of the
> documentation. There is no place in our docs that a "standard trigger"
> would fit without seeming like a wart; but a contrib module can document
> itself pretty much however it wants.
>
I was thinking a new section on 'trigger functions' of the functions and
operators chapter, linked from the 'create trigger' page. That doesn't
seem like too much of a wart.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-21 14:15:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Hot Standby utility and administrator functions |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-10-21 14:10:16 | Re: corrupted pg_proc? |