From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Window Functions: buffering strategy |
Date: | 2008-10-20 19:24:52 |
Message-ID: | 48FCDB04.2080008@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hitoshi Harada wrote:
> The real problem is not how to cut off preceding rows, but how to read
> ahead after the current row. I intend to avoid reading ahead until end
> of the partition for only row_number() that doesn't need any following
> rows. Sometimes we have to store whole the partition before returning
> the first result and sometimes not. It depends on function categories,
> or function access range. My current idea is classify Window function
> API to three parallel to buffering strategies.
Could the rows be read ahead on demand? If the window function calls
window_getarg on a row that's not yet fetched, fetch forward to that row.
> And the lag()/lead(), spec says "OFFSET is exact numeric literal" but
> we postgres doesn't have mechanism to limit the function argument data
> type to Const integer only. So I am thinking about OFFSET for
> lag()/lead() may be dynamic integer variable. If it comes, even those
> functions don't know how many rows should be cut off. The lag()/lead()
> can access any row of partition, per spec.
Hmm, yeah, that's a bit of a problem :-(.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-10-20 20:09:09 | Re: Index use during Hot Standby |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-10-20 19:23:28 | Re: Subtransaction commits and Hot Standby |