Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED

From: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>, Charlie Savage <cfis(at)savagexi(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED
Date: 2008-10-15 16:52:57
Message-ID: 48F61FE9.5070904@esilo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Does fork/exec preserve lock ownership on Windows?
>

Not to my knowledge. On windows, there is only CreateProcess
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682425.aspx) That doesn't
resemble the behavior of fork or exec at all. Basically, there is no
fork, windows favors threading models. The only thing inheritable are
handles, which doesn't include locked portions of a file.

The LockFileEx docs state:

"If a process terminates with a portion of a file locked or closes a
file that has outstanding locks, the locks are unlocked by the operating
system."

--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-10-15 17:26:31 Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-10-15 16:52:54 Re: 8.3 .4 + Vista + MingW + initdb = ACCESS_DENIED