| From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The Axe list |
| Date: | 2008-10-11 04:09:51 |
| Message-ID: | 48F0270F.3000304@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> intagg: ... Has not been updated since 2001.
Really? Just a couple years ago (2005) bugs we reported were
still getting fixed in it:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-03/msg00202.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-04/msg00165.php
Here's one use-case I had at the time.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-04/msg01249.php
I think we still use that code, but I suppose I can re-write it
to use features that were added since then.
And hey - where'd README.int_aggregate go? IIRC that had
a couple interesting use-cases too.
I also like intagg, because it's kinda like a "hello world" for
writing one kind of C extensions. I'm not saying it needs to
stay in contrib. Perhaps it could live on as an example in the docs?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tomas | 2008-10-11 04:47:46 | Re: The Axe list |
| Previous Message | Joshua Drake | 2008-10-11 03:49:54 | Re: The Axe list |