Re: Question About UNION

From: Bill Thoen <bthoen(at)gisnet(dot)com>
To: David Wilson <david(dot)t(dot)wilson(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question About UNION
Date: 2008-10-09 19:49:27
Message-ID: 48EE6047.8070904@gisnet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

David Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Bill Thoen <bthoen(at)gisnet(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>> Thanks, but that didn't work. That selected only the records from table1.
>>
>
> That's why I warned you about it being written in gmail. :)
>
I'm sorry, you had it right the first time. Here's a script that
verifies it:

create table table1 (
a integer,
b integer,
c char(1)
);

insert into table1 values ( 1, 12, 'A');
insert into table1 values ( 2, 16, 'B');
insert into table1 values ( 8, 6, 'A');
insert into table1 values (19, 9, 'C');
insert into table1 values (20, 12, 'A');

create table table2 (
a integer,
b integer,
c char(1)
);

insert into table2 values ( 1, 13, 'D');
insert into table2 values ( 2, 16, 'B');
insert into table2 values ( 8, 6, 'B');
insert into table2 values (12, 5, 'A');

select * from table1
union
select table2.* from table2 left join table1 on table2.a=table1.a and
table2.b=table1.b where table2.a is null;

drop table table1;
drop table table2;

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raymond O'Donnell 2008-10-09 19:52:17 Fwd: Set-valued function in wrong context
Previous Message David Wilson 2008-10-09 19:35:32 Re: Question About UNION