| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeffrey Baker <jwbaker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch |
| Date: | 2008-09-29 02:58:24 |
| Message-ID: | 48E04450.9080501@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>>
>> this works better but there is something fishy still - using the same
>> dump file I get a proper restore using pg_restore normally. If I
>> however use -m for a parallel one I only get parts (in this case only
>> 243 of the 709 tables) of the database restored ...
>>
>>
>>
>
> Yes, there are several funny things going on, including some stuff
> with dependencies. I'll have a new patch tomorrow with luck. Thanks
> for testing.
>
>
OK, in this version a whole heap of bugs are fixed, mainly those to do
with dependencies and saved state. I get identical row counts in the
source and destination now, quite reliably.
cheers
andrew
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| parallel_restore_3.patch | text/x-patch | 36.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2008-09-29 04:24:48 | Re: Ad-hoc table type? |
| Previous Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2008-09-29 02:31:26 | Operation needed for datfrozenxid bug? |