From: | John Huttley <John(at)mib-infotech(dot)co(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Slow updates, poor IO |
Date: | 2008-09-26 23:09:31 |
Message-ID: | 48DD6BAB.8040302@mib-infotech.co.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi Greg,
I've got 32M shared on a 1G machine and 16 checkpoint segments.
I'll run some tests against 64 segments and see what happens.
Your previous postings were extremely helpful wrt the MVCC issue.
I thank you!
-john
Greg Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, John Huttley wrote:
>
>> running update file set perms='0664' took about 10 mins
>
> What do you have checkpoint_segments and shared_buffers set to? If
> you want something that's doing lots of updates to perform well, you
> need to let PostgreSQL have a decent size chunk of memory to buffer
> the index writes with, so it's more likely they'll get combined into
> larger and therefore more easily sorted blocks rather than as more
> random ones. The randomness of the writes is why your write rate is
> so slow. You also need to cut down on the frequency of checkpoints
> which are very costly on this type of statement.
>
> Also: which version of PostgreSQL? 8.3 includes an improvement aimed
> at updates like this you might benefit from.
>
> --
> * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-09-27 07:04:08 | Re: Slow updates, poor IO |
Previous Message | John Huttley | 2008-09-26 23:03:38 | Re: Slow updates, poor IO |