| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Einars <einars(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Chaotically weird execution plan |
| Date: | 2008-09-24 01:13:31 |
| Message-ID: | 48D9943B.9060801@postnewspapers.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Einars wrote:
> As query plan shows, it got the
> correct answer, 15888, very fast: the rest of the 13 seconds it's just
> rechecking all the comments for some weird reasons.
I'd already written: "If you need the test for status = 1, consider a
partial index" when I noticed your schema definition:
> "comments_created_by" btree (created_by) WHERE status = 1
I find it hard to guess why it's having to recheck the WHERE clause
given the use of a partial index that should cover that nicely. I don't
see how it could be a visibility issue (in that I thought tuples were
read and tested for visibility as part of the initial heap scan) but I
don't see what else it could be.
It seems odd to me, so I'm really interested in seeing what others have
to say on this.
--
Craig Ringer
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-24 02:58:10 | Re: Chaotically weird execution plan |
| Previous Message | Einars | 2008-09-24 00:53:49 | Chaotically weird execution plan |