Re: Assert Levels

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assert Levels
Date: 2008-09-21 16:49:43
Message-ID: 48D67B27.6000708@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> Well, we don't. That's why I'd suggest to do it slowly and classify
> everything as medium weight until proven otherwise.

Once you have classified all asserts, what do we do with the result?
What would be the practical impact? What would be your recommendation
about who runs with what setting?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-21 17:09:13 Proposal: move column defaults into pg_attribute along with attacl
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-21 16:05:43 Re: Toasted table not deleted when no out of line columns left