Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs)

From: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs)
Date: 2008-09-17 14:37:37
Message-ID: 48D11631.8070709@esilo.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Chernow wrote:
> New patch following our discussion with updated docs.
>
>>> few logical errors). I don't think it makes sense to do it
>>> otherwise, it would be like calling free after a malloc failure.
>>
>> I can live with that definition, but please document it.
>>
>>
>
> To build on this analogy, PGEVT_CONNRESET is like a realloc. Meaning,
> the initial malloc "PGEVT_REGISTER" worked by the realloc
> "PGEVT_CONNRESET" didn't ... you still have free "PGEVT_CONNDESTROY" the
> initial. Its documented that way. Basically if a register succeeds, a
> destroy will always be sent regardless of what happens with a reset.
>
>

I attached the wrong patch. I'm sorry.

--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgevents.patch text/plain 11.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2008-09-17 14:47:01 Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-09-17 14:36:46 Re: Autovacuum and Autoanalyze

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd Helmle 2008-09-17 18:49:00 Re: still alive?
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2008-09-17 14:29:23 Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs)