From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Ron Mayer" <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Kevin Grittner" <Kgrittn(dot)CCAP(dot)Courts(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.3 vs HEAD difference in Interval output? |
Date: | 2008-09-15 22:13:03 |
Message-ID: | 48CE979F.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> I find the results on 8.3.3 with integer timestamps surprising:
Even more surprising is the behavior for interval(1) here:
ccdev=# select '1 year 2 mons 3 days 04:05:06.64321'::interval;
interval
-------------------------------------
1 year 2 mons 3 days 04:05:06.64321
(1 row)
ccdev=# select '1 year 2 mons 3 days 04:05:06.64321'::interval(1);
interval
----------------------------------
1 year 2 mons 3 days 04:05:06.60
(1 row)
ccdev=# select '1 year 2 mons 3 days 04:05:06.64321'::interval(2);
interval
----------------------------------
1 year 2 mons 3 days 04:05:06.64
(1 row)
ccdev=# select '1 year 2 mons 3 days 04:05:06.64321'::interval(3);
interval
-----------------------------------
1 year 2 mons 3 days 04:05:06.643
(1 row)
etc.
That trailing zero should be considered a bug.
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2008-09-15 22:15:04 | Re: 8.3 vs HEAD difference in Interval output? |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2008-09-15 22:03:08 | Re: 8.3 vs HEAD difference in Interval output? |