From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Jef Peeraer <jef(dot)peeraer(at)telenet(dot)be> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: xml queries & date format |
Date: | 2008-09-11 10:32:51 |
Message-ID: | 48C8F3D3.3030905@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jef Peeraer wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Jef Peeraer <jef(dot)peeraer(at)telenet(dot)be> writes:
>>>> i am using the xml add-ons, but the date output format seems to be wrong :
>>> I think the conversion to xml intentionally always uses ISO date format,
>>> because that's required by some spec somewhere.
>> Yes, it follows XML Schema. Which is why the output format is even slightly
>> different from the SQL-mandated ISO format.
> i understand, but that makes it very difficult to change the date format
> afterwards. i simple flag to indicate no date conversion would be
> helpfull....
Well, these table_to_xml etc. functions are heavily constrained by the
SQL standard, XML Schema, and others. They do what they are supposed to
do. You are free to design your own XML export format or apply
postprocessing to the existing ones (XSLT?). I don't think we should
overload the existing functions with everyone's favorite but apparently
completely nonstandard formatting variant flag.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-09-11 10:38:17 | Re: external query VS user function |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-09-11 10:23:57 | Re: xml queries & date format |