From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | William Garrison <postgres(at)mobydisk(dot)com>, Postgres General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Install Postgres on a SAN volume? |
Date: | 2008-09-09 08:37:09 |
Message-ID: | 48C635B5.9050108@hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Greg Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> As long as your SAN guarantees an atomic snapshot of all your data
>> (which every SAN I've ever heard of guarantees if you're on a single
>> volume - entry level SANs often don't have the functionality to do
>> multi-volume atomic snapshots, though), you don't need to set up PITR
>> for simple backups
>
> It's all those ifs in there that leave me still recommending it. It's
> certainly possible to get a consistant snapshot with the right hardware
> and setup. What concerns me about recommending that without a long list
> of caveats is the kinds of corruption you'd get if all those conditions
> aren't perfect will of course not ever happen during testing. Murphy
> says that it will happen only when you find yourself really needing that
> snapshot to work one day.
Well, I agree one should be careful, but I don't see the risk if you
just change all those ifs into a single one, which is "if all your data
*and* WAL is on the same SAN LUN".
(heck, you don't need hardware to do it, you can do software snapshot
just fine - as long as you keep all your stuff on the same mountpoint
there as well)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-09-09 08:41:20 | Re: Postgres in a solaris zone - patch 125077-02 needed |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-09-09 08:31:18 | Re: 8.3 on FreeBSD 6.3, sudden performance degradations |