Re: Prototype: In-place upgrade v02

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Prototype: In-place upgrade v02
Date: 2008-09-07 15:53:36
Message-ID: 48C3F900.1050904@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I didn't see anything that looked like an immediate change in user table
> contents, unless they used the "name" type; but what of relation forks?

Relation forks didn't change anything inside relation files, so no
scanning of relations is required because of that. Neither will the FSM
rewrite. Not sure about DSM yet.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-09-07 16:18:11 Re: [HACKERS] New shapshot RPMs (Sep 7 2008) are ready for testing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-07 15:29:29 Re: Prototype: In-place upgrade v02