From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Need more reviewers! |
Date: | 2008-09-05 14:03:03 |
Message-ID: | 48C13C17.201@bluegap.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:19 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> All this would do is to deter people from submitting patches. Hard rules
>> like this don't work in FOSS communities. I know it's like herding cats,
>> but persuasion is really our only tool.
+1
> I don't *want* the rule, I just think we *need* the rule because
> otherwise sponsors/managers/etc make business decisions to exclude that
> aspect of the software dev process.
I agree that making sponsors/managers/etc aware of that aspect of the
dev process is necessary and worthwhile. However, I don't think a rule
for *patch submitters* helps with that. There must be other ways to
convince managers to encourage reviewers.
Regards
Markus Wanner
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andriy Bakay | 2008-09-05 14:04:20 | PostgreSQL SSL problem |
Previous Message | Andrew Chernow | 2008-09-05 13:54:41 | Re: libpq events update |