From: | Artacus <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
Date: | 2008-09-05 03:47:16 |
Message-ID: | 48C0ABC4.2030309@comcast.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
So that is for real huh? I've been to that web site before and figured
it was more marketing talk about what they wanted to do rather than a
product that was already to market.
> 2008/9/4 Artacus <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net>:
>> Oh, as I was writing a CUBE query today and realized that I forgot to
>> mention this. And unlike most gripes, like MERGE INTO or CTE's which are
>> really convenience things, this is key piece of functionality that you just
>> can't reproduce in Postgres.
>>
>
> It is not true. First look at this:
> http://www.analyticsql.org/
>
> In atachment is two snapshots from production system (Analytic SQL
> Server based on PostgreSQL 8.3)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Artacus | 2008-09-05 03:52:13 | Re: Getting affected rows in pgplsql |
Previous Message | Artacus | 2008-09-05 03:37:00 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-09-05 07:36:09 | Shut down cygwin and ports lists |
Previous Message | Artacus | 2008-09-05 03:37:00 | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |