Re: Oracle and Postgresql

From: Artacus <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oracle and Postgresql
Date: 2008-09-05 03:47:16
Message-ID: 48C0ABC4.2030309@comcast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-www

So that is for real huh? I've been to that web site before and figured
it was more marketing talk about what they wanted to do rather than a
product that was already to market.

> 2008/9/4 Artacus <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net>:
>> Oh, as I was writing a CUBE query today and realized that I forgot to
>> mention this. And unlike most gripes, like MERGE INTO or CTE's which are
>> really convenience things, this is key piece of functionality that you just
>> can't reproduce in Postgres.
>>
>
> It is not true. First look at this:
> http://www.analyticsql.org/
>
> In atachment is two snapshots from production system (Analytic SQL
> Server based on PostgreSQL 8.3)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Artacus 2008-09-05 03:52:13 Re: Getting affected rows in pgplsql
Previous Message Artacus 2008-09-05 03:37:00 Re: Oracle and Postgresql

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-09-05 07:36:09 Shut down cygwin and ports lists
Previous Message Artacus 2008-09-05 03:37:00 Re: Oracle and Postgresql