| From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch |
| Date: | 2008-08-25 02:31:37 |
| Message-ID: | 48B21989.9090200@zeut.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
>
>> I think everyone agrees that partial vacuums would be useful / *A Good
>> Thing* but it's the implementation that is the issue.
>>
>
> I'm not sure how important it will really be once we have support for
> dead-space-map-driven vacuum.
Is that something we can expect any time soon? I haven't heard much
about it really happening for 8.4.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2008-08-25 06:26:30 | Re: IN, BETWEEN, spec compliance, and odd operator names |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-08-25 02:17:16 | Re: can't stop autovacuum by HUP'ing the server |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-08-25 06:15:49 | make some internal SRF functions use output parameters |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-24 19:16:08 | Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch |