From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: request for sponsors page |
Date: | 2008-08-22 17:51:08 |
Message-ID: | 48AEFC8C.5030607@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>> No, I'm not because if you think we should start tracking and listing
>>>> everyone that gives us five bucks then you clearly need to come in out
>>>> of the sun for a while :-).
>>> Why not? It's the best way to increase the number of people who give us
>>> $5.
>>
>> Well, someone giving three qualified answers to a mailing list inquiry
>> on a user list is worth a lot more than five bucks of their time, and
>> you surely don't want to include that in your listing.
>>
>
> If we use money as the qualifier for sponsorships listing anything less
> than 5 - 10k is silly. We already provide thank you, hand shake, and
> general acknowledgment. Here is the thing, most of the people that
> contribute are already getting their return from:
Well, $2000 is a small amount for a corporation, but it's a very large
amount for an individual. I seriously think that donors like Gevik, who
gives us around $400 a year of his personal money in addition to
contributing time, deserve some extra recognition.
I agree that having a threshold for listing on the website is sensible,
I'd just like to have that threshold a little lower than you would.
--Josh Berkus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-08-22 17:59:00 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #4279: Bad codepage in our web-site |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-08-22 17:46:53 | Re: request for sponsors page |