Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence
Date: 2008-08-18 19:47:43
Message-ID: 48A98B8F.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 4:29 PM, in message
<27116(dot)1219008559(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> If you're still interested in testing CVS HEAD's handling of EXISTS,
> I've about finished what I wanted to do with it.

Thanks. I'm very interested; unfortunately I can't get to it until at
least Friday.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-08-18 19:51:28 Re: Overhauling GUCS
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-08-18 19:47:32 Re: Text Selectivity Operators in String Types