| From: | Kevin Murphy <murphy(at)genome(dot)chop(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How to use postgresql-jdbc rpm with Sun JDK |
| Date: | 2008-08-08 18:59:39 |
| Message-ID: | 489C979B.6010901@genome.chop.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Kevin Murphy <murphy(at)genome(dot)chop(dot)edu> writes:
>
>> Speaking as a near-ignoramus, would a simple RPM that wraps the binary
>> jar file make sense?
>>
>
> Sure, if you want to do it that way. We did in fact do it that way up
> till about 8.0. We (or at least I) moved away from it because of Red
> Hat's policy that source RPMs should contain only, well, source.
> But if you roll your own you certainly need not be bound by that
> ideology.
After looking in more detail at what the gcj packages install, I've
decided it's no big deal to just use Devrim's
postgresql-jdbc-8.3.603-1PGDG.rhel5.x86_64.rpm package as is.
While the java-1.4.2-gcj-compat and libgcj RPMs are needlessly
installed, they don't interfere with Rocks' Java metapackage (roll), as
I had feared.
Thanks for the responses,
Kevin Murphy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-08 20:42:16 | Re: Unlinked files in PGDATA/base following unclean shutdown |
| Previous Message | Jack Orenstein | 2008-08-08 18:52:14 | Unlinked files in PGDATA/base following unclean shutdown |