Re: Plz Heeeelp! performance settings

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: dforums <dforums(at)vieonet(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Plz Heeeelp! performance settings
Date: 2008-08-07 14:12:54
Message-ID: 489B02E6.4010701@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

dforums wrote:
> The performance problem is really only on the insertion and even more on
> the treatment for the aggregation.
>
> To treat the 3000 entrances and to insert, or update the tables it needs
> 10 minutes.
>
> As I told you I inject 14000 query every 2 minutes, and it needs 10
> minutes to treat 3000 of those query.

Sorry - I still don't understand. What is this "treatment" you are doing?

> >
> > OK. I assume you're happy with the plans you are getting on these
> > queries, since you've not provided any information about them.
>
> The plan seems ok as it use index as well.
> here is the plan :
>
> explain analyse SELECT "insertUpdateTracks"(137,2605, 852, ('2008-08-06
> 19:28:54'::text)::date,3,'dailydisplay',2,NULL);
> INFO: method 1
> QUERY PLAN
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=1.151..1.151
> rows=1 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 1.160 ms

There's nothing to do with an index here - this is a function call.

> Has you can see the runtime processs for an update in this table.
>
> multiplying this per 10000, it is too long.

So - are you calling this function 14000 times to inject your data?
You're doing this in one transaction, yes?

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ries van Twisk 2008-08-07 14:30:48 Another index related question....
Previous Message dforums 2008-08-07 13:30:16 Re: Plz Heeeelp! performance settings