From: | Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: bytea encode performance issues |
Date: | 2008-08-07 06:51:56 |
Message-ID: | 489A9B8C.5020804@compulab.co.il |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I ran the update, but now (obviously) it wants to vacuum again and
vacuum on that table took 9 hours yesterday.
Do the statistics change when changing the storage type? Meaning does it
really need to vacuum?
Thank you
Sim
Tom Lane wrote:
> Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> writes:
>> After the alter table, then I have to update each row with an
>> update dbmail_messageblks set messageblk=messageblk;
>> so that it uses the new storage.
>
> I wouldn't actually bet on that changing anything at all ...
> I'd try something like messageblk = messageblk || '' to make
> completely sure the value gets detoasted.
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cyril SCETBON | 2008-08-07 07:46:42 | Checkpoints writes |
Previous Message | Tomasz Ostrowski | 2008-08-07 06:47:05 | Re: looking for psql without server-installation |