| From: | Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jef Peeraer <jef(dot)peeraer(at)telenet(dot)be> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: replication only |
| Date: | 2008-08-05 10:14:29 |
| Message-ID: | 48982805.3090807@iol.ie |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 05/08/2008 08:21, Jef Peeraer wrote:
> would be the best option to go with. Slony i presume, although schema
> chanages are not propagated.
Schema changes *are* propagated in Slony, using the EXECUTE SCRIPT
statement:
http://www.slony.info/documentation/stmtddlscript.html
Ray.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland
rod(at)iol(dot)ie
Galway Cathedral Recitals: http://www.galwaycathedral.org/recitals
------------------------------------------------------------------
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sam Mason | 2008-08-05 11:35:05 | Re: is a 'pairwise' possible / feasible in SQL? |
| Previous Message | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo | 2008-08-05 10:00:05 | equivalent of "using namespace" with schema |