Re: Planning for Scalability

From: Roberto Grandi <roberto(dot)grandi(at)trovaprezzi(dot)it>
To: ktm(at)rice(dot)edu
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planning for Scalability
Date: 2014-10-03 13:43:49
Message-ID: 489451174.6283029.1412343829265.JavaMail.zimbra@trovaprezzi.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Dear All

thanks for your precious help. I'll come back to the list once analyzed our system.

Roberto

----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: ktm(at)rice(dot)edu
A: "Roberto Grandi" <roberto(dot)grandi(at)trovaprezzi(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Inviato: Venerdì, 3 ottobre 2014 15:00:03
Oggetto: Re: [PERFORM] Planning for Scalability

On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 10:55:04AM +0200, Roberto Grandi wrote:
> Dear Pg people,
>
> I would ask for your help considering this scaling issue. We are planning to move from 3Millions of events/day instance of postgres (8 CPU, 65 gb ram) to 5 millions of items/day.
> What do you suggest in order to plan this switch? Add separate server? Increase RAM? Use SSD?
>
> Any real help will be really precious and appreciated.
> Roberto
>

Hi Roberto,

This change is within a factor of 2 of your existing load. I would start with
analyzing the load on your existing system to determine where your bottlenecks
are. 5M/day is 57/sec evenly distributed or 174/sec in an 8 hour period. This
does not seems like a lot, but you have given us no details on your actual
workload.

Regards,
Ken

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Lizenko 2014-10-03 15:38:15 query plan question, nested loop vs hash join
Previous Message ktm@rice.edu 2014-10-03 13:00:03 Re: Planning for Scalability