Re: hibernate nativequery and uuid

I have given it consideration, but haven't tried it as I have concluded
that I would still have the same issue. The problem occurs with the
client attempting to apply a UUID value to filter the result set. So I
would still have a datatype mismatch if I were to use a view.

I am confident that I can get it to work if I were to remove Hibernate
and make a direct JDBC call, as I have tested that approach previously.
That is a fall back position. But I would like if I can to keep to a
single approach with my DB access for this application if I can.

The suggestion was appreciated though.

A.M. wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2008, at 5:57 PM, Andrew wrote:
>
>> I'm currently using JPA with Hibernate as my ORM and have been able
>> to convince hibernate to play nicely with the Postgresql UUID. Most
>> of my queries have been in EJBQL using the JPA entity manager's
>> createQuery. However when I try to do a UNION, JPA only returned the
>> results of the first query, and ignored the other UNION queries,
>> which is in line with what I have read online, in that JPA does not
>> support UNIONS.
>> So I'm currently attempting to go via a createNativeQuery call. The
>> keys on the target tables are PostgreSQL UUID data types. When doing
>> so I get the following error:
>>
>> org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: operator does not exist:
>> uuid = character varying
>>
>> The only relevant thing I have been able to find relating to it is
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2007-12/msg00061.php which
>> suggests adding a ::uuid cast to the parameter.
>>
>> However, when doing that, hibernate thinks that it is a named
>> parameter and complains.
>> org.hibernate.QueryException: Not all named parameters have been set
>>
>> Hibernate's functionality to declare an escape character for a LIKE
>> clause does not apply to this. But in attempting to escape the
>> colons, getting various other hibernate parsing errors, so my
>> attempts down this path has not been of help.
>>
>> Has anyone else run into this issue and been able to resolve it?
>>
>> I'm using Postgresql 8.3.3 on Windows XP, Hibernate 3.2.6.GA and the
>> Postgresql 8.3-603 JDBC4 driver.
>
> Could you use a view to hide the UNION?
>
> Cheers,
> M
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.comVersion: 8.0.138 / Virus Database:
> 270.5.8/1582 - Release Date: 7/30/2008 6:37 PM
>
>
>