From: | Jan Urbański <j(dot)urbanski(at)students(dot)mimuw(dot)edu(dot)pl> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search |
Date: | 2008-07-29 07:27:11 |
Message-ID: | 488EC64F.20701@students.mimuw.edu.pl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Jan Urbański wrote:
>> Here's a WIP patch implementing an oprrest function for tsvector @@
>> tsquery and tsquery @@ tsvector.
>>
>> The idea is (quoting a comment)
>> /*
>> * Traverse the tsquery preorder, calculating selectivity as:
>> *
>> * selec(left_oper) * selec(right_oper) in AND nodes,
>> *
>> * selec(left_oper) + selec(right_oper) -
>> * selec(left_oper) * selec(right_oper) in OR nodes,
>> *
>> * 1 - select(oper) in NOT nodes
>> *
>> * freq[val] in VAL nodes, if the value is in MCELEM
>> * min(freq[MCELEM]) / 2 in VAL nodes, if it is not
>
> Seems reasonable.
>
>> *
>> * Implementation-wise, we sort the MCELEM array to use binary
>> * search on it.
>> */
>
> Would it be possible to store the array in sorted order, to avoid
> sorting it on every invocation of tssel?
It's being stored sorted on frequencies, like so:
[('dog', 0.9), ('cat', 0.8), ('sheep', 0.7)]
and I need it sorted on elements for bsearch().
I don't know if it's OK to break the rule that statistical data is
stored sorted on freqneucies. If so, then ts_typanalyze() would have to
change and do one more qsort() before storing the result.
--
Jan Urbanski
GPG key ID: E583D7D2
ouden estin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-07-29 07:53:26 | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-07-29 07:23:49 | Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search |