Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Asko Oja <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-28 16:01:40
Message-ID: 488DED64.3050300@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Asko Oja wrote:
>
> About citext. Skype is using various hacks and workarounds because
> there was no such type in PostgreSQL and i understand others also. To
> me it seems to be choice between couple of developers doing it once
> and for all and hundreds of developers inventing the wheel every day
> and not to mention hours spent debugging over various layers of
> applications. It just shows how hackers have totally different point
> of view on things from people who are using the program:) But again i
> am just a manager and should be lower than grass in hackers list :)
>
>

Plenty of us who are hackers are also users.

ISTM that Tom's objection is really that citext is a hack, and that it
will actually make it harder for us to get to a collation-based case
insensitive comparison. I think if we adopt that view then we need to
form a plan for doing this right, and soon, as it is a significant
current pain point, especially for people migrating from other databases.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-07-28 16:06:17 Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-07-28 15:59:12 Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode