| From: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |
| Date: | 2008-07-25 07:48:24 |
| Message-ID: | 48898548.8050603@sigaev.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> (a) that's not back-patchable and (b) it'll create a merge conflict with
> your patch, if you're still going to add a new AM function column.
> I think that aminsertcleanup per se isn't needed, but if we want an
> "amanalyze" there'd still be a conflict. Where are we on that?
I'll revert aminsertcleanup framework but leave gininsertcleanup function as is,
because I'll not have enough time until end of summer - I'd like to finalize
patch and fixes first.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | daveg | 2008-07-25 07:52:23 | Re: Additional psql requirements |
| Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-07-25 07:45:20 | Re: Review: DTrace probes (merged version) ver_03 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-07-25 19:46:18 | Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2008-07-25 00:26:52 | Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 |