From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: PANIC: invalid index offnum: 186 when processing BRIN indexes in VACUUM |
Date: | 2017-10-31 23:12:38 |
Message-ID: | 48884877-a64f-0019-c837-64ca9fb335de@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/31/2017 11:44 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> ...
> Unfortunately, I think we still have a problem ... I've been wondering
> if we end up producing correct indexes, so I've done a simple test.
>
> 1) create the table as before
>
> 2) let the insert + vacuum run for some time, to see if there are
> crashes (result: no crashes after one hour, inserting ~92M rows)
>
> 3) do a bunch of random updates on the data (while still doing the
> concurrent vacuum in another session)
>
> 4) run a bunch of simple queries to compare the results, essentially
>
> -- BRIN index
> SET enable_bitmapscan = on;
> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM brin_test WHERE a = $1;
>
>
> -- seq scan
> SET enable_bitmapscan = on;
> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM brin_test WHERE a = $1;
>
> and unfortunately what I get is not particularly pleasant:
>
> test=# set enable_bitmapscan = on;
> SET
> test=# select count(*) from brin_test where a = 0;
> count
> -------
> 9062
> (1 row)
>
> test=# set enable_bitmapscan = off;
> SET
> test=# select count(*) from brin_test where a = 0;
> count
> -------
> 9175
> (1 row)
>
> Attached is a SQL script with commands I used. You'll need to copy the
> commands into multiple psql sessions, though, to simulate concurrent
> activity).
>
FWIW I can reproduce this on 9.5, and I don't even need to run the
UPDATE part. That is, INSERT + VACUUM running concurrently is enough to
produce broken BRIN indexes :-(
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tels | 2017-10-31 23:31:29 | Re: Account for cost and selectivity of HAVING quals |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-10-31 23:05:38 | Re: PostgreSQL 10 parenthesized single-column updates can produce errors |