From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10 |
Date: | 2008-07-23 15:13:11 |
Message-ID: | 48874A87.4080803@sun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane napsal(a):
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> By the way, these programs start with
>> package require Pgtcl
>> but we don't provide that library. Should that bother us?
>
> Hmm. The scripts actually depend on both pltcl and Pgtcl, so just
> pushing them out to the Pgtcl package wouldn't really improve matters.
> I think it's fine to leave them where they are ... though we should
> document the dependency.
>
> Actually it looks like it's been a very long time since these scripts
> got any love anyway. There's no reason anymore to split modules into
> multiple rows (not since TOAST...) and they're not schema-safe either.
> Anybody feel like cleaning them up? Or should we leave 'em as-is
> for compatibility reasons?
Just a dumb question, does we need this functionality? Does anybody use it?
Zdenek
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-23 15:19:21 | Re: [PATCH] "\ef <function>" in psql |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-23 15:05:35 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |