From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: email built in type |
Date: | 2004-05-08 18:48:33 |
Message-ID: | 488400000.1084042113@sparkey.oopsware.intra |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--On Samstag, Mai 08, 2004 14:14:10 +0200 Gaetano Mendola
<mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> about you is it ok for you if I write the email built in type ?
>
> I know of course that I can do it with a DOMAIN.
>
> Regards
> Gaetano Mendola
Funny, I had the idea some time ago, too. The problem was that I needed some
fast and easy-to-use interface to manage much email adresses for a
e-marketing system. Because i've run out of time, i decided to do syntax
stuff on the application side (the regexp for validation isn't really
complicated...) and queries with some kind of "access functions" like
get_domain, get_alias. If you put a functional index on them the queries
are fast and efficient.
Query all email adresses for a specific characteristic with such functions
isn't complicated, you can do that even with SUBSTRING in simple
SQL-functions and i can't really see the advantage of a '>>' operator
against a get_domain() function (regarded to usability) now.
Anyways, perhaps this is something for pgfoundry?
--
Bernd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-08 18:48:37 | Relocatable installs |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-05-08 17:10:47 | Re: email built in type |