Re: Parallel heap vacuum

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel heap vacuum
Date: 2024-12-12 23:05:49
Message-ID: 487757b6-f489-4b03-a16d-6fd63cc29c31@vondra.me
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/13/24 00:04, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
> ...
> Attached are results.csv with raw data, and a PDF showing the difference
> between master and patched build with varying number of workers. The
> columns on the right show timing relative to master (with no parallel
> workers). Green means "faster" and "red" would be "slower" (but there
> are no such cases). 50% means "half the time" i.e. "twice as fast".
>
> ...

Apologies, forgot the PDF with results, so here it is.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra

Attachment Content-Type Size
parallel-vacuum.pdf application/pdf 62.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2024-12-12 23:11:54 Re: Controlling the usage of a user-defined cast
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2024-12-12 23:04:02 Re: Parallel heap vacuum