From: | Klint Gore <kgore4(at)une(dot)edu(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Bright D(dot)L(dot)" <dl_bright(at)star-quest(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SELECT Query returns empty |
Date: | 2008-07-10 05:33:49 |
Message-ID: | 48759F3D.1010408@une.edu.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bright D.L. wrote:
> >Once step 6 completes, can psql see the data?
>
> Yes, P1 makes sure and is able to see the data before sending Packet to
> P2.
>
Not P1, but psql. If you can see the data from psql, then your problem
has to be in P2. If you can't see the data from psql, then P1 is the
problem.
> >Does "select * from pg_stat_activity" show anything unexpected?
>
> I have to investigate on that side.
>
If it's as everyone thinks, then one of them will probably be idle in
transaction when queried from psql between step 6 and 7. Running it
from P1 or P2 will just tell you that its running "select * from
pg_stat_activity", not if it's still in transaction.
You could try setting log_statement='all' and check that the logs look
like you would expect. Especially the commits from both sides.
klint.
--
Klint Gore
Database Manager
Sheep CRC
A.G.B.U.
University of New England
Armidale NSW 2350
Ph: 02 6773 3789
Fax: 02 6773 3266
EMail: kgore4(at)une(dot)edu(dot)au
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2008-07-10 05:35:39 | Re: Making a RPM installer |
Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2008-07-10 05:30:14 | Re: Making a RPM installer |