Re: Feature: FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature: FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED
Date: 2008-07-09 08:52:19
Message-ID: 48747C43.5080401@postnewspapers.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Csaba Nagy wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 16:23 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> Especially if it returned an updated row count or supported the
>> RETURNING clause, so you could find out after the fact what was or
>> wasn't done.
>
> Well, it is supposed to be used as "SELECT ... FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED",
> so you can in fact put the locked row ids in the target list. With a
> "LIMIT 1" appended would be the perfect way to check out the next queue
> item to process...

That makes sense. I was thinking of UPDATE ... SKIP LOCKED RETURNING
instead, which could be handy in similar situations.

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Markus 2008-07-09 08:53:39 Re: SELECT Query returns empty
Previous Message Csaba Nagy 2008-07-09 08:45:00 Re: Feature: FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED