| From: | Maximilian Tyrtania <maximilian(dot)tyrtania(at)contactking(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Odd query result |
| Date: | 2012-08-27 15:09:31 |
| Message-ID: | 48738939-0BFA-4ACD-9658-CF94B8AB754C@contactking.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Am 27.08.2012 um 16:18 schrieb Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Maximilian Tyrtania <lists(at)contactking(dot)de> writes:
>
>> Sorry, should have mentioned that…Dropping and recreating it fixed it.
>
> Hm, had you changed the behavior of that function since creating the
> index?
To be honest - I don't know for sure. I might well have.
Maximilian Tyrtania
Contact King Software Entwicklung
Tel.: ++49/30/664040-544
http://www.contactking.de
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | EXT-Rothermel, Peter M | 2012-08-27 16:46:21 | Re: Overlapping time ranges constraints in 8.4 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-08-27 15:07:55 | Re: [GENERAL] Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |