From: | Ken Johanson <pg-user(at)kensystem(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Timestamp without Timezone and differing client / server tzs |
Date: | 2008-07-08 07:20:46 |
Message-ID: | 4873154E.6020808@kensystem.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi all ,first let me describe the set up:
Server: Postgresql 8.3.x
Server's postgresql.conf:timezone = UTC
Server's OS (Linux tz): /etc/localtime -> /usr/share/zoneinfo/UTC
Client JDBC driver: PostgreSQL 8.3devel JDBC3g with SSL (build 602)
Client/JVM TZ : America/Denver
Now, execute query:
rs = st.exceuteQuery("SELECT NOW()");//understood to be a with-tz type
rs.next();
out.println(rs.getString(1)); --> 2008-07-08 07:09:59.284012+00
(expected, denver +0700)
out.println(rs.getTimestamp(1)); --> 2008-07-08 01:09:59.284012
(expected, implicit Denver time)
Now do a DML via prepared statement into a Timestamp without Timezone.
ps.setTimestamp(new Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis()));
and select it:
out.println(rs.getString(1)); --> 2008-07-08 14:09:59.284012+00
(un-expected??)
out.println(rs.getTimestamp(1)); --> 2008-07-08 07:09:59.284012
(un-expected??)
Question: with ts without tz storage, should not a timestamp be
normalized to the servers implicit TZ (UTC in this case), since that is
set in the config's client-tz?
Also, is it possible/not to set the preferred TZ as a URL param to the
driver? This would be a safe option (not break apps), I believe. It
allows the string translation without tz to match the server's implicit
(zone-less string) tz.
Thanks,
Ken
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2008-07-08 07:44:08 | Re: Timestamp without Timezone and differing client / server tzs |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2008-07-07 23:33:15 | Re: server-side prepared Statements |