| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Vadim Karacharsky <sw(at)mail(dot)ru>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #4267: initdb fails |
| Date: | 2008-06-28 13:12:15 |
| Message-ID: | 486638AF.1010402@postnewspapers.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Dave Page wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Craig Ringer
> <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>
>> Alas, Process Explorer doesn't seem to work on Vista. MS think that Process
>> monitor is a replacement, but it lacks all the handy detailed process
>> introspection, thread control, etc that Process Explorer has.
>>
>> Frustrating.
>
> Eh? Process Monitor certainly works on Vista (although I haven't used
> it on SP1 yet). I used it extensively when trying to figure out a
> rather nasty bug issue in our privilege-shedding code a while back.
Interesting. I've always had system stability problems after launching
either it or filemon. I'm about to configure a clean Vista install (post
hard disk failure) so I'll have to re-test. Perhaps there was a hook DLL
or similar nastyness interfering.
--
Craig Ringer
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2008-06-28 13:16:40 | Re: BUG #4267: initdb fails |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-06-28 12:56:00 | Re: BUG #4267: initdb fails |